Panty Ho ! A Hundred Years Of ' Covering ' Up
BY R.K.MISRA
How
do you describe a garment that heats up half of humanity and cools down the
other half ?
Poised
perilously between male fantasy and feminine felicity ,the panty remains the
softest thing between two legs. This piece of attire has waxed and waned over a hundred years to
emerge from a coarse legging to a soft
as satin statement of an iron hard resolve. Along the way it has picked up a
matching upper body companion piece and the twain possess the fabled capacity
to have long entombed pharaohs come alive and run to a Nile on fire,
pep-pill in hand !
Nevertheless,
it’s shrinking wafer thin size should in
no way be seen as a sign of weakness. Symbolisms do empower. More so at a time
when social scientists predict the beginning of
an era of ascendency for womanhood globally. At a more mundane level,
the fact of the matter is that it has
also given the feminine of the species a sense of cosy comfort and credible control over their
own choices. Three cheers for womankind and the panty which ennobles her, for
completing a hundred years !
The
present day itsy-bitsy, shorter than shortest clinger had a long john like
beginning.(a hip to ankle tight dress for males which made it’s advent in 17th
century England but found popularity as a sleepwear in the 18th
century).
Cotton
panties owe their invention to Etienne Valton
and were the successor to traditional wollen undergarments which felt
too long for the new age . In 1918 Etienne was inspired enough to cut the legs
off a pair of long underwear . And lo and behold the earliest version of the
panty was born. The underpants had a squarish shape with a high but curved
waist. Buttons replaced ribbons for adjustment at the waist.
Underwear
evolved majorly in the last century from cotton granny briefs which would be
branded staid by present day standards if not downright ugly. Long hose,
stockings and layers of petticoats were worn under the skirt in the early 19th
century by most british women. Wealthy ladies who wore sheer garments adopted men’s drawers known as pantaloons for
modesty purposes. These were made of a light stockinet fabric, usually in a
flesh toned nude colour. They came down to the knees, sometimes to the ankles.
Subsequently the pantaloons merged into knickers. In those days poor women
could not afford underwear in Victorian
times but Queen Victoria was a great proponent of women’s panties and these knickers became
very fashionable.
Plain
or embellished knickers were loose shorts that came to the knees but they were
tighter and silk and flannel became the cloth of choice for it. Combinations
came into vogue at the turn of the
century and these were full bodied underwear that included a bra top.
Introduced in 1877,they remained in use until the late 1950s.
It
was however in 1924 that the knickers became known as panties. By the 1940s, it had become a lot
skimpier and ‘butt’ fitting. The 1950s and the
1960s saw the undergarments turn sexier with lace and pastel colours
making their presence felt. Like an army camp flag at sundown, the garment
began it’s slow descent from the high waistly perch around this time. The
introduction of nylon gave wings to the designers fantasy making a form fitting
cling easier, besides making it cheaper too.
It
was in the late sixties that the hipster briefs made their presence felt as low
rise shorts that did not completely cover the butts and were hip hugging in
form. The G-string followed with a ‘thongs’ sweep in the nineties primarily
because it prevented panty lines.
Sexy
underwear is a comparatively recent phenomenon with variety matching shape, form,
choice and wearer through hipsters, shorts, thongs, bikini bottoms, full
panties with the half-mast and the hoister in the works.
If
a structureless silhouette was the order of the day in the twenties, a curvier
silhouette emphasizing hips and waist became popular in the thirties with slips
becoming the garment of choice in the forties, often featuring bra cuts, thin
straps and V-lines. Fifties ushered in the era of the hourglass silhouette with
emphasis on large bust and a small waist. High waisted brief panties helped
achieve this.
The
sixties flowered smaller patterned
lingerie with playful and girlish styles while the seventies saw fringe and
tassles gain precedence with high waisted cuts making a strong return.
The
women of the eighties were not afraid to make bolder choices so diverse
material and bright colours made their debut. Rockstars like Madonna left an
indelible stamp on the undergarment fashion scene as they flirted with leather and fishnet.
According
to global fashion magazine ,Glamour, the nineties were marked by mismatched
separates and the 2000s by sexy form fitting styles while the 2010s is all
about details.
Beauty
may lie in the eyes of the beholder, but the self-confident woman of the day
carries a devil may care attitude about
dressing. If you have it, why not flaunt it. I have a right to myself and your
problems are your own, is how she would
like to put it.
The
modern woman is re-thinking and re-defining herself. And it is showing. Whether
in the re-thinking on the period panty or in the’ going commando’ movement-the
bright and busy liberating feeling about going
without panties. And ditching the
bra as well. Was it not Jean-Dennis Rouillon, a sports medicine specialist at
the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire in France who was quoted as saying “Medically, physiologically,
anatomically- breasts gain no benefit
from being denied gravity”.
It
may at best be a fad but the lingerie
industry better watch out !
It is very interesting.Well researched history of the development of evolution of the panty.Aftrrall who is benefitted of reduced rate of covering of the vitalities of the body?
ReplyDeleteFun reading...Good one, RK!!
ReplyDelete